Presidents and politics seem to have been filling North Texas stages. Recently, Lyndon Johnson was portrayed in the drama, ‘All the Way,’ at the Dallas Theater Center. Now we have an opera about John F. Kennedy premiering in Fort Worth, while in Dallas, there’s ‘Deferred Action.’ It’s a brand-new play about Latino activists in a presidential campaign. KERA’s All Things Considered host Justin Martin talked with Art & Seek’s Jerome Weeks about the two new premieres
So Jerome, what’s with all the presidents and would-be presidents onstage these days?
He was the guy who got the Voting Rights Act through Congress.
But then Vice President Johnson barges into the hotel suite. I understand LBJ functions here as comic relief, but his portrayal as a macho buffoon, complete with flags and confetti and hookers is disappointing.
Instead, the most affecting moments in the opera come in scenes like the duet between Jackie, sung by Daniela Mack, and her future self, Jackie Onassis, sung by Katharine Goeldner. Jackie asks, does he love me? And she’s basically told, “He will love you — every day for the rest of his life.”
And she doesn’t know that JFK’s got – what? – maybe 12 hours left to live?
And visually, ‘JFK’ — directed and set designed by Thaddeus Strassberger — is a dazzling production. Ironically, three years ago, we began the 50th anniversary commemoration of the assassination of Kennedy with ‘Hotel Texas,’ the Dallas Museum of Art and Amon Carter collaboration that re-created the mini-art exhibition put up in the Kennedy’s hotel suite by Fort Worth arts patrons. It was an eerie and moving bit of time travel — to stand among the last artworks the Kennedys saw together. And here on stage, we see it again, bookending all that’s happened since 2013, all the reconsiderations of JFK, LBJ, the events in Dealey Plaza and so on. We began with the 24 hours just before the disaster struck, and we end with them, too — as if keeping that portentous calamity off-stage for a while allowed us this contemplation. It allowed us to view things fresh, view different images, not simply re-hash the familiar Zapruder frame shots, Cronkite getting teary-eyed on TV and all the conspiracy babble.
But then, given this little intake of breath before chaos comes, Little and Vavrek promptly stuff in other considerations, considerations about history and fate. So in addition to the LBJ cartoon, there’s all this complicated stuff about John Wilkes Booth and the fates – as if the Greek fates were in on the conspiracy with Lee Harvey Oswald. It all seems unnecessary. Besides, Stephen Sondheim handled the Booth/Oswald links much better in ‘Assassins.’
The very human drama here is the Kennedys just trying to find each other again through their haze of pain and dope and the loss of their child and JFK’s philanderings and the pressures of politics. For anyone who saw the utterly harrowing Little/Vavrek opera, ‘Dog Days,‘ — presented by Fort Worth Opera last year and still the company’s bravest, most disturbing production — the overall effect of ‘JFK’ may feel familiar. Perhaps this is the Little/Vavrek mode: All the dark, incredible stuff is offset by some achingly lovely music. But I wonder if the difference here is that ‘Dog Days’ was inspired by a Judy Budnitz short story, while this crowded libretto is original with Vavrek.
If the opera ‘JFK’ is trying for the human, you’ve reported that ‘Deferred Action’ at the Dallas Theater Center is definitely political.
In ‘Deferred Action,’ it’s immigration reform for the DREAMers, the young Latinos brought here illegally by their parents. But this story’s told from the viewpoint of the activists, not the politicos trying to manipulate them or help them. The DREAMers have to decide whether to support a Latina Democrat, who’s cagey and incremental on immigration reform because she doesn’t want to alienate middle-of-the-road white voters — or do they go with this loose-cannon conservative Republican who promises complete citizenship?
As the main character, Javi, played by Ivan Jasso says, arguing in favor of the loose cannon: “We only want one thing. He can do it if we get enough people behind him.” To which his fellow DREAM activists can only shout in disbelief, “You can’t be serious.” And that argument escalates to really heated levels with marriages, political loyalties and generational differences on the line.
So is ‘Deferred Action’ often like that?
But then Brusasco has to pull off this conversionary pivot. Jenkins asks Javi and his fellow DREAMers to believe that he’s now absolutely serious about immigration reform, even if all his other political stands (anti-abortion, pro-oil pipeline, anti-government regulation) are completely anathema to them. He wants to bring the young generation of Latinos into America, into the Republican Party — because he actually believes it’s the Christian thing to do.
There are two problems here: One, every serious conservative candidate who’s tried to break this particular logjam and bring Hispanics into the Republican Party — John McCain, Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio — has gotten absolutely hammered by the nativists, by the Tea Partiers, basically, by the white, working-class base that, regardless of whether they’re truly racist or not, fears Latino immigration as a direct threat to their declining economic well-being. The political leaders who’ve proposed any kind of reform — even while swearing they’re not offering amnesty or something like a path to citizenship — they’ve all gotten beaten down so hard, they’ve had to walk back their proposals on immigration and border safety. Rubio’s retreat was so complete, it was positively craven.
So for Javi to believe Jenkins might actually be able to deliver immigration reform — even if Jenkins can sell it to social conservatives as the Christian thing to do — that’s a big stretch.
Co-authors David Lozano and Lee Trull confront this point honestly — through their tough-talking Latina candidate (Christie Vela), who tells Jenkins his bill is dead-on-arrival. But then Lozano and Trull turn around and, somehow, magically, the bill gets out of committee and looks to be a real, live possibility.
Second, Jenkins must be a creditable presidential candidate with a real shot at immigration reform. That’s because Javi’s choice has to be a real choice — and not just a dilemma cooked up by the authors for high drama. If Jenkins is a demagogic rube with a colorful line of folksy sayings, then our Latino activist Javi looks like a fool to gamble on him. This is his life, his reputation, and possible deportation on the line.
Frankly, I don’t think the script or Brusasco comes close to pulling off the transformation. Jenkins does risk the hatred of the nativists (we see angry, gun-wavers shouting they’ve been betrayed and they’re going to throw him out of office), but one can argue that this only makes his chances at passing reform look even weaker. What does Jenkins do to prove himself worthy of Javi risking everything?
I’ve gone deep into the trenches on the political battles in ‘Deferred Action’ because that’s where this drama really lies. It’s not about any heart-warming interpersonal whatchamacallit. True, Javi’s newfound stance risks his engagement to Lisa (Elizabeth Ramos), but that question gets popped in the first scene and Javi is such a clean-cut figure — Mr. Diaz Goes to Washington And Gets Well And Truly Mad — that one can’t help feeling the marriage was never the gamble he was risking. Even his Granny (Frida Espinosa-Muller) is mostly just some grey hair exuding warmth and family history, a way for Lozano and Trull to bring in the horrors of the border crossing (and link this play to its predecessor in the projected trilogy, ‘The Dreamers’).
Javi is only fully human when he’s fully enraged, period. Otherwise, Ivan Jasso is just a nice-looking bro. Sorry, but as the title itself makes clear, ‘Deferred Action’ is about politics, that’s all. But it’s about politics the way ‘The Normal Heart’ was about AIDS: It wants to get theatergoers angry. Was anyone ever truly touched by any relationship in Larry Kramer’s drama? What we remember is Ned Weeks’ scalding rage over his friends’ needless deaths from AIDS and how that energized his activism, his empowering gay sensibility.
So: to Lozano and Trull’s credit, these characters aren’t really human, they just aren’t. But neither are they easy bad guys and easy good guys peddling us tripe. What they give us are hard, furious debates.